Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 3475/2009 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 6 February 2013.
1. The Plaintiff’s claim is for damages for goods lost during transportation carried out by the Defendant under an overall agreement leading to a series of transactions. The claim is for RMB255,916. The Defendant denies and contends that the Plaintiff’s goods were duly delivered and received by authorized receivers in Shenzhen. Further or in alternative, the Defendant alleges that clause 5 printed at the back of the courier forms (“ the Limitation Clause”) applied to restrict compensation due if