Read the full judgment text of CACV 000130/1981 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. This is an appeal against a decision of a District Judge whereby a landlord was refused an order for possession where he had claimed that he required the premises for the occupation of his son. It is common ground that the only issue is one of "reasonable requirement, and the test which is accepted is that which has been adopted generally in the United Kingdom and was laid down by Sheriff Blades, K.C. in Aitken v Shaw 1933, S.L.T. 21, where it was said that the reasonableness of a landlord's