BabelCite

HKSAR v. Ou Jiejing

Read the full judgment text of CACC 460/2011 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 January 2013.

1. Para 65L-M on page 19 should read “...the proceeds in the two bank accounts were the proceeds of an indictable offence”;

Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACC 460/2011
Court
Court of Appeal
Date17 Jan 2013
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 460/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 460 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 316/2011)

------------------------

BETWEEN
  HKSAR Respondent

and
  OU JIEJING (區杰靜) Applicant
------------------------
Before: Hon Stock VP, Line and Macrae JJ in Court
Date of Hearing: 17 January 2013
Date of Judgment: 17 January 2013
Date of Reasons for Judgment: 5 February 2013

------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

------------------------------

Notice is hereby given that the following errors are found in the judgment:

1.Para 65L-M on page 19 should read “...the proceeds in the two bank accounts were the proceeds of an indictable offence”;

2.Para 67F on page 20 should read “Also, it is to be noted…” and

3.Para 67I on page 20 should read “…14 cash withdrawals totalling $1,935,000.”

Dated this 13 March 2013.

  (M.Y. MAK)(Miss)
  Clerk to Hon. Line, J.
Cites 2 cases

Cases cited in this judgment

HKSAR v. Ou Jiejing
CACC 460/2011
Court of Appeal17 Jan 2013
HKSAR v. Ou Jiejing
DCCC 316/2011
District Court27 Oct 2011
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 460/2011

HKSAR v. Ou Jiejing
Court of Appeal17 Jan 2013