Read the full judgment text of CACV 000131/1995 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 25 October 1995.
1. The respondent company, Head Step Limited, sought approval of building plans in four successive submissions to the appellant, the Building Authority. I shall call the respondent "Head Step" and the appellant "The Building Authority". By the time of the third submission which was made on a set of wrong plans and duly withdrawn, the Outline Zoning Plan No. S/K11/5 had been amended to Outline Zoning Plan No. S/K11/6. The effect of the amendment was to lower the permitted plot ratio from 15 to 12
Cited by 5 cases