Read the full judgment text of DCCC 64/2012 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 19 April 2013.
1. The defendant is convicted after trial of one charge of possession of child pornography, contrary to section 3(3) of the Prevention of Child Pornography Ordinance, Chapter 579 (charge 1), and one charge of publishing child pornography, contrary to section 3(2) of the Prevention of Child Pornography Ordinance (charge 2).
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 5 cases