Read the full judgment text of HCMA 492/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 April 2013.
1. Appellant 1 (“A1”) was charged with “possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacture goods to which a forged trade mark was applied”, contrary to section 9(2) as read with section 18(1) of the Trade Description Ordinance, Cap 362. Appellant 2 (“A2”) was charged with the same offence. As the two cases arose out of the same incident they were tried together.
Cites 2 cases