HKSAR v. Cheung Man Lung
|
DCCC 1041/2012 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1041OF 2012 -----------------------------------
-----------------------------------
--------------------------------- Reasons for Sentence --------------------------------- Charges and facts 1.The defendant pleads guilty to possession of a dangerous drug (1st Charge) and trafficking in a dangerous drug (3rd Charge). 2.At 1947h on 15 August 2012, the police conducted an anti-crime patrol outside ground floor, Kai Sin House, Upper Wong Tai Sin Estate, Kowloon. The defendant was searched and found to have a paper packet containing 0.02 g of a powder containing ketamine. He admitted it was for his own consumption. He was released on police bail. 3.At 1745 h on 18 September 2012, the police conducted an anti-crime patrol outside ground floor, Lung Kwong House, Lower Wong Tai Sin Estate, Kowloon. The defendant got off from a private vehicle. They found on him:
4.In the car were:
5.He said the ketamine was for his own consumption and the money his own savings. 6.The police estimated a retail value of HK$14,776.80. He possessed the said 112.80 g of powder containing 83.89 g of ketamine for the purpose of trafficking. Personal background and mitigation 7.He is 36 years of age, of F. 1 education level. He has 12 previous convictions for possession of dangerous drugs and other convictions for dissimilar offences. He was an air-conditioning technician before arrest. He earned $15,000 per month. He lived with his niece and mother in Sau Mau Ping, Kowloon. His mother was in bad health. He took charge of his mother and the household expenses. His niece has written a mitigating letter for him. 8.During his remand, he had the opportunity to be initiated into the Christian faith with penitence for his misdeeds. The chaplain wrote a mitigating letter for him. Sentencing guidelines 9.In HKSAR v Hii Siew Cheng [2007] 1 HKLRD 1, the Court of Appeal has suggested 6 – 9 years for trafficking in 50 – 300 g of ketamine. Sentencing this defendant 10.On the 1st Charge, I take 12 months as the starting point as he has been a recidivist for possession of dangerous drugs. I reduce it by one-third because of his plea of guilty. There are no other mitigating factors. The sentence is 8 months. 11.On the 3rd Charge, I take a starting point of 7 years (ie 84 months) in view of the quantity of ketamine and empty plastic bags as well as his commission of this offence in the course of his police bail granted him 1 month and 3 days ago for the possession charge. I reduce it by one-third because of his guilty plea. There are no other mitigating factors. The sentence is 4 years and 8 months (ie 56 months). 12.By totality, I order the 2 sentences to be run concurrently. His eventual sentence remains as 4 years and 8 months (ie 56 months).
|
Cases cited in this judgment