Read the full judgment text of DCEC 147/2012 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. In this case, I dismissed the claim by the applicant (“ DT ”) against the respondent (“ Lam ”) for employees’ compensation after trial. Judgment was handed down on 29 January 2013. Following that event, I made a nisi order that except for Lam’s costs of obtaining and adducing surveillance evidence, DT shall pay the costs of the application to Lam, including any costs reserved. Costs shall be taxed, if not agreed, with certificate for counsel. In the absence of application within 14 days to va
Cites 1 case