Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 1894/2010 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 21 June 2013.
1. The plaintiff is a contractor engaging in decoration and engineering work, whereas the defendant is a company engaging in the supply and installation of furniture. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant was in breach of statutory implied conditions of an agreement and a supplemental agreement entered between the parties on 20.5.2009 and 19.8.2009 respectively for the supply and installation of furniture and built-in fitting works, and claims against the defendant for the following losses an