Read the full judgment text of CACC 417/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 12 August 2013.
1. The appellant, who was D3 at trial, faced trial in the District Court in respect of a Charge Sheet containing twelve charges against four defendants. The appellant was charged only with three charges and in respect of all of those three charges he was jointly charged with D1. The charges he faced were the fourth, fifth and sixth charges on the Charge Sheet and all three charges were for the offence of fraud, contrary to section 16A of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210 and were committed by him o
Cited by 19 cases · Cites 1 case