Read the full judgment text of HCMA 781/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 12 August 2013.
1. The appellant was the 2 nd defendant in the trial. It faced a summons of “possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacture goods to which a forged trade mark was applied”, contrary to section 9(2) as read with section 18(1) of the Trade Description Ordinance, Cap 362 (“TDO”). The 1 st defendant, Mr Summy Jamal (“D1”) faced a charge of a similar offence.