BabelCite

De Monsa Investments Ltd v. Whole Win Management Fund Ltd

Read the full judgment text of CACV 251/2010 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 23 August 2011.

1. At page 2, paragraph 4 line R, “The Defendant purported to forfeit the deposit” should read “The Defendant has withheld the deposit”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 251/2010
Court
Court of Appeal
Date23 Aug 2011
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 251/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 251 OF 2010

(ON APPEAL FROM HCMP NO. 2603 OF 2008)

------------------------

  IN THE MATTER of a preliminary sale and purchase agreement dated 11 January 2008 (“the Agreement”) between Whole Win Management Fund Limited and De Monsa Investments Limited for the sale and purchase of the property known as Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 on Penthouse 37th Floor Bank of America Tower No. 12 Harcourt Road Hong Kong (“the Property”)
  and
  IN THE MATTER of section 12 of the Conveyancing and Property Ordinance, Cap. 219
------------------------

BETWEEN
  DE MONSA INVESTMENTS LIMITED Plaintiff

and
  WHOLE WIN MANAGEMENT FUND LIMITED Defendant
----------------------
Before: Hon Tang VP, Fok JA and Lam J in Court
Date of Hearing: 23 June 2011
Date of Handing Down Judgment: 23 August 2011
Date of Corrigendum: 4 September 2013

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________

1.At page 2, paragraph 4 line R, “The Defendant purported to forfeit the deposit” should read “The Defendant has withheld the deposit”.


  Clerk to Hon Tang PJ
    (Ingrid Lam) (Ms)
Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

De Monsa Investments Ltd v. Whole Win Management Fund Ltd
CACV 251/2010
Court of Appeal22 Feb 2012
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACV 251/2010

De Monsa Investments Ltd v. Whole Win Management Fund Ltd
Court of Appeal23 Aug 2011
De Monsa Investments Ltd v. Whole Win Management Fund Ltd
Court of Appeal22 Feb 2012