Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 2163/2013 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 30 August 2013.
1. In this case, the plaintiff, a licensed money lender, claims against the defendant for outstanding amount of principal and interest due to the plaintiff under two agreements, one in Chinese and the other in English, both dated 8 February 2012. The Chinese and English agreements actually formed a composite one. The Chinese agreement can be said to be a summary of the major terms of the loan, probably prepared for the benefits of borrowers who may not be conversant in English, whilst the Engl