Hua Tyan Development Ltd v. Zurich Insurance Co Ltd and Another

Read the full judgment text of CACV 190/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 19 September 2013.

1. The 2 nd defendant which is represented by Leung and Lau has chosen not to lodge written submissions.

Cited by 2 cases

Case No.CACV 190/2012
Court
Court of Appeal
Date19 Sep 2013
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 190/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 190 OF 2012

(ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 480 of 2009)

________________________

BETWEEN

HUA TYAN DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Plaintiff
and
ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
(formerly known as ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY)
1st Defendant
COURTESY INSURANCE CONSULTANTS LIMITED 2nd Defendant

________________________

Before : Hon Cheung, Chu and Barma JJA in Court
Date of Plaintiff’s Written Submission : 26 August 2013
Date of 1st Defendant’s Written Submission : 26 August 2013
Date of Judgment on Costs : 19 September 2013

________________________

JUDGMENT ON COSTS

________________________

Hon Cheung JA (giving Judgment of the Court) :

1.The 2nd defendant which is represented by Leung and Lau has chosen not to lodge written submissions.

I.  Costs between the plaintiff and the 1st defendant

2.As the 1st defendant is successful in its appeal it is entitled to the costs of the appeal and below.  The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the 1st defendant to be taxed if not agreed.

3.It is reasonable and proper for the plaintiff to sue the 1st defendant and the 2nd defendant in the alternative.  In fact it would have been ill advised not to join and sue the 2nd defendant at the same time.  The plaintiff is entitled to seek repayment of the costs from the 2nd defendant by way of a Bullock Order.

II.  Costs between the plaintiff and the 2nd defendant

4.As judgment is now entered against the 2nd defendant in favour of the plaintiff, the 2nd defendant is to pay the plaintiff’s costs, to be taxed if not agreed, of the appeal (including the Respondent’s Notice and Notice of Appeal) and below (including all such costs of and occasioned by or incurred as a result of the joinder of the 1st defendant).

III.    Costs of Contribution Notice between the 1st and 2nd defendants

5.The 1st defendant is to have the costs of the Contribution Notice against the 2nd defendant, to be taxed if not agreed.

(Peter Cheung) (C Chu) (Aarif Barma)
Justice of Appeal Justice of Appeal Justice of Appeal

Mr Chan Chi Hung SC and Mr Jeremy SK Chan, instructed by S.K. Lam, Alfred Chan & Co., for the Plaintiff

Mr Russell Coleman SC, instructed by Reed Smith Richards Butler, for the 1st Defendant

Leung and Lau for the 2nd Defendant

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACV 190/2012