BabelCite

HKSAR v. Lam See Chung, Stephen

Read the full judgment text of CACC 339/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 3 September 2013.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACC 339/2012
Court
Court of Appeal
Date03 Sep 2013
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 339/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 339 OF 2012

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 476 OF 2012)

________________________

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
and
LAM SEE CHUNG, STEPHEN (林思聰) Applicant

________________________

Before: Hon Lunn JA and McWalters J in Court
Date of Hearing: 2 August 2013
Date of Judgment: 3 September 2013

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________

The paragraph 41 on page 13 Line I,

“In respect of the Mr Hemmings’ second assumption it is true there is an element of abuse of trust in the applicant’s conduct.”

should read

“In respect of Mr Hemmings’ second assumption it is true there is an element of abuse of trust in the applicant’s conduct.

The paragraph 41 on page 13 Line M,

“As with most employees, this victim was required to work at her employer’s premises, here his home and so, whilst she performed her duties she had to leave her personal possessions unattended.”

should read

“As with most employees, this victim was required to work at her employer’s premises, here his home, and so whilst she performed her duties she had to leave her personal possessions unattended.

Dated this 22nd day of November, 2013.

  (Miss Queenie MAK)
  Clerk to Hon McWalters J
Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

HKSAR v. Lam See Chung,Stephen
CACC 339/2012
Court of Appeal
Full analysis
03 Sep 2013
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 339/2012

HKSAR v. Lam See Chung,Stephen
Court of Appeal
Full analysis
03 Sep 2013