Read the full judgment text of CACC 874/1972 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The Appellant was one of four young men charged with robbery. There was also a charge of wounding against one of the others, with which we are not concerned. After a trial in the District court the Appellant was convicted and he now appeals against his conviction. His ground of appeal is that there was no evidence or no sufficient evidence whereon to found the conviction, and he continues to assert his innocence.