Ho Suk Man v. Sit Tim Mau and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCPI 122/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 November 2013.
1. In the second sentence of paragraph 58, the word “that” after “account” should be deleted.
Cited by 5 cases
|
HCPI 122/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 122 OF 2011
BETWEEN
_________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M _________________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 22 November 2013: 1.In the second sentence of paragraph 58, the word “that” after “account” should be deleted. 2.In the second sentence of paragraph 81, insert the word “promotion” after “in line for”. 3.In the sentence of paragraph 85, the word “accident” should be deleted and replaced by “writ”.
|
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 122/2011