Ho Suk Man v. Sit Tim Mau and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 122/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 November 2013.

1. In the second sentence of paragraph 58, the word “that” after “account” should be deleted.

Cited by 5 cases

Case No.HCPI 122/2011
Court
High Court CFI
Date22 Nov 2013
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI 122/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 122 OF 2011

_________________________

BETWEEN

  HO SUK MAN Plaintiff
  and  
  SIT TIM MAU Defendant
  and
  CHEUNG TAK WAI 1st Third Party (Discontinued)
  NG KAM SHEUNG 2nd Third Party (Discontinued)
  NG MAN 3rd Third Party (Discontinued)
  WAH KEE SEA LAND TRANSPORTATION LIMITED 4th Third Party (Discontinued)
  _________________________
Before: Hon Zervos J
Date of Trial: 5, 6, 8 and 11 November 2013
Date of Judgment: 22 November 2013
Date of Corrigendum: 3 December 2013

_________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_________________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 22 November 2013:

1.In the second sentence of paragraph 58, the word “that” after “account” should be deleted.

2.In the second sentence of paragraph 81, insert the word “promotion” after “in line for”.

3.In the sentence of paragraph 85, the word “accident” should be deleted and replaced by “writ”.

  (Clara Ng)
  Clerk to the The Hon Justice Zervos