|
CACC 139/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 139 OF 2013
(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 300 OF 2012)
____________
|
BETWEEN
|
| |
HKSAR |
Respondent |
|
and
|
| |
MO HIU FUNG (毛曉風) |
Applicant |
| ____________ |
| Before: Hon Lunn JA and McWalters J in Court |
| Date of Hearing: 28 November 2013 |
| Date of Judgment: 28 November 2013 |
| Date of Reasons for Judgment: 13 December 2013 |
________________________
________________________
The paragraph 19 on page 7 Line P,
“A police officer was called to testify to retrieving information from the victim’s mobile telephone.”
should read
“A police officer was called to testify to retrieving information from the applicant’s mobile telephone.”
The paragraph 20 on page 8 Line L,
“The finding of multiple bruises on the truck and limbs was compatible with being caused by pumping onto hard surfaces or hitting by a fist, as alleged by the victim.”
should read
“The finding of multiple bruises on the trunk and limbs was compatible with being caused by bumping onto hard surfaces or hitting by a fist, as alleged by the victim.”
The paragraph 31 on page 12 Line O,
“… and the second matter was the failure of the applicant to seek help before the rape the subject of the fifth count.”
should read
“… and the second matter was the failure of the victim to seek help before the rape the subject of the fifth count.”
Dated this 17th day of December, 2013.
| |
(Danny Tse) |
| |
Clerk to Hon McWalters J |
|