吳文演 and Another v. 人事登記審裁處
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 72/2011 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 January 2014.
1. 3 rd line of paragraph 8, “5 February 1999” should read “30 January 1999”.
Cites 1 case
|
HCAL 72/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 72 OF 2011 _______________
______________ Corrigendum ______________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 29 January 2014:- 1.3rd line of paragraph 8, “5 February 1999” should read “30 January 1999”. 2.4th line of paragraph 9, “13 August 2007” should read “30 March 2007”. 3.3rd line of paragraph 35, “…public authority which may have affect his civil rights…” should read “…public authority which may affect his civil rights…”. 4.12th line of paragraph 54, “…the Tribunal had unjustly and unreasonably…” should read “…the Tribunal had acted unjustly and unreasonably…”. 5.2nd line of paragraph 55, “…which intervenes with the court’s jurisdiction…” should read “…which interferes with the court’s jurisdiction…” 6.3rd line of paragraph 73, “the applicants’ OPW” should read “the applicants’ OWPs”. 7.In page 26, “Interests Party” should read “interested party”. Dated this 25 day of February 2014
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 72/2011