Read the full judgment text of HCMA 756/2013 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 13 March 2014.
1. It may turn out to be the case, if all the relevant facts were known, that the knowledge, acts and omissions of the crane operator are properly to be attributed to the appellant company which own the crane so that his knowledge, acts and omissions can, as the Magistrate thought, provide basis on which to deprive the appellant company of its costs despite its acquittal. After all, he was not only an employee of the appellant company but also a director of it and the holder of 25% of the shares