Good Mark Industrial Ltd v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue

HCAL 88/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW PROCEEDINGS

NO 88 OF 2012

____________

_______________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_______________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 28 March 2014:

1.3^rd and 4^th lines of paragraph 13, “[2012] HLRD 911” should read “[2012] 2 HKLRD 911”.

2.9^th line of paragraph 13, “if late applicable for objections and revision of assessments” should read “if late applications for objections and revision of assessments”.

3.2^nd line of paragraph 18, “the respondent was entitled” should read “the applicant was entitled”.

4.5^th line of paragraph 29(b), “notice of assess” should read “notice of assessment”.

5.2^nd line of paragraph 30(2), “the Jan 2008 assessment” should read “the Jan 2005 assessment”.

Dated this 23^rd day of April 2014.