Read the full judgment text of DCCC 253/2013 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The defendant pleaded guilty in front of Judge Sham to one charge of ‘dealing with proceeds of an indictable offence’ and was duly convicted. However, as a result of communication between counsel and the learned judge that took place during mitigation, judge Sham considered that it was better that he did not continue to deal with the defendant’s sentencing. The case eventually came before me.