Read the full judgment text of HCMA 276/2013 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 6 June 2014.
1. There are 11 appellants in this appeal, all represented by the same two counsel now just as they had all been represented by those two counsel at the trial in the Magistrates’ Court. The 1 st appellant is a limited company while each of the other appellants is an individual. Each of the 11 appellants faced a summons charging an offence under s. 23(6) of the Town Planning Ordinance, Cap. 131 (“the TPO”). All of these summonses were in identical terms, saying that the defendant, being a person
Cites 1 case