Cheng Tang Kam Yung v. Tang Kam Cheung and Another

Read the full judgment text of CACV 185/2013 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 10 July 2014.

1. The defendants apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal against our judgment of 27 March 2014.The issue we addressed in our judgment was the defendants’ appeal out of time against the decision of Chu JA sitting as a single judge of the Court of Appeal.  Chu JA refused to stay execution of the judgment of Deputy Judge Leung pending the determination of the defendants’ appeal against that judgment.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 185/2013
Court
Court of Appeal
Date10 Jul 2014
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 185/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 185 OF 2013

(ON APPEAL FROM HCMP NO. 147 OF 2008)

________________________

BETWEEN

CHENG TANG KAM YUNG Plaintiff
and
TANG KAM CHEUNG (鄧錦祥) 1st Defendant
TANG KAM CHEUNG (鄧錦祥)
appointed by the Order dated 27th December 2012 to represent the estate of CHEUNG YUK YING (張玉英), deceased since deceased
2nd Defendant

________________________

Before : Hon Cheung, Yuen and Kwan JJA in Court
Date of Hearing : 8 July 2014
Date of Decision : 10 July 2014

________________________

D E C I S I O N

________________________

Hon Cheung JA (giving Decision of the Court) :

1.The defendants apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal against our judgment of 27 March 2014.The issue we addressed in our judgment was the defendants’ appeal out of time against the decision of Chu JA sitting as a single judge of the Court of Appeal.  Chu JA refused to stay execution of the judgment of Deputy Judge Leung pending the determination of the defendants’ appeal against that judgment.

2.In our view the defendants have failed to satisfy the requirement for obtaining leave to appeal.  The refusal to stay execution is not a final judgment.  It does not satisfy the ‘as of right’ limb.  No issue of great, general or public importance has been identified.  The defendants merely suggested during the oral submission that the case involved traditional customs without any elaboration.  Nor is the ‘or otherwise’ limb engaged.

3.Accordingly the application is refused with costs to the plaintiff to be taxed if not agreed.

(Peter Cheung) (Maria Yuen) (Susan Kwan)
Justice of Appeal Justice of Appeal Justice of Appeal

Mr Matthew Tse, instructed by Lily Fenn & Partners, for the plaintiff

The 1st and 2nd defendants, unrepresented, appeared in person