Read the full judgment text of CACC 344/2013 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 24 June 2014.
1. The five applicants, who were D1 to D5 at trial, were tried in the District Court before Deputy District Judge Longley (“the judge”) on a Charge Sheet which charged all of them with attempted robbery, contrary to section 10 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210 and section 159G of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap 200 and the 2 nd applicant only with a further charge of possession of a false instrument, contrary to section 75(1) of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap 200. On 16 September 2013 they were all convicte