Read the full judgment text of DCCC 232/2014 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 13 June 2014.
1. The defendant has been convicted after trial of one offence of robbery. Now, the evidence coming from the CCTV recording of the event shows it to be an unarmed robbery of a mobile phone valued between five and six thousand dollars. The victim afterwards did not go to hospital, so there is no medical report on his injuries. Suffice it to say force was used at the time of the taking of the item, but I say no weapon was used and no lasting injury caused. So it is to be treated as an unarmed robb
Cites 1 case