Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite..
1. The first contention on behalf of the Appellants is “that the learned judge ought to have held on the evidence before him that in reality the 1st Appellant did not pay the purchase price or any part thereof but acted as the Respondent’s trustee in the purchase of the said property”. The substance of the argument is that the judge made two findings of fact which, it is said, led to the inevitable conclusion that the 1st Appellants were trustees. One finding was that on 9th January, 1969 Mr. La