Read the full judgment text of HCA 2368/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 1 August 2014.
1. The plaintiff (“ IRISL ”) has obtained a Mareva injunction ex parte against the defendants. It sought continuation of the injunction inter partes . The 1 st defendant (“ Phiniqia ”) the 2 nd defendant (“ Tradeline ”) refused to accept service; and together with the 3 rd defendant (“ Ghurair ”), they did not enter appearance. The 4 th defendant (“ Lafir ”), the 5 th defendant (“ Frever ”) and the 6 th defendant (“ Corera ”) contested and sought discharge of the injunction as far as it concerne
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case