HKSAR v. Wong Tak Keung
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 45/2014 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.
1. On the applicant’s Notice of Motion for leave to appeal, we grant leave to appeal on the following questions of law, namely:
Cites 2 cases
|
FAMC No. 45 of 2014 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 45 OF 2014 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC NO. 220 OF 2011) ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________ Appeal Committee: Chief Justice Ma, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ and Mr Justice Fok PJ Date of Hearing and Determination: 12 August 2014 ________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N ________________________ Chief Justice Ma: 1.On the applicant’s Notice of Motion for leave to appeal, we grant leave to appeal on the following questions of law, namely:
2.We also grant leave to appeal on the basis that it is reasonably arguable that the applicant’s conviction should be quashed on the ground that, in upholding the conviction, the Court of Appeal expanded the scope of the conspiracy from a conspiracy having one objective to one with multiple objectives and that this expansion gave rise to procedural unfairness.
Ms Margaret Ng and Mr Kay K.W. Chan, instructed by Alan Ho & Co., for the Applicant Mr Martin Hui SADPP and Mr Ivan Cheung PP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent |