Kidde China Ltd v. Etech Fire Ltd

HCMP 1673/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1673OF 2014

(ON AN INTENDED APPEAL FROM DCCJ NO. 1392 of 2011)

____________________

____________________

Before : Hon Cheung CJHC and Lam VP

Date of Judgment : 16 September 2014

____________________

C O R R I G E N D A

____________________

Please be informed that:-

1.At page 1, the name of the Plaintiff “KIDDIE CHINA LIMITED” should read “KIDDE CHINA LIMITED”.

2.At page 3 paragraph 8 line L,

“In the statement of the Plaintiff lodged on 19 August 2014, Mr Ho (counsel for the Plaintiff) … ”

should read

“In the statement of the Defendant lodged on 19 August 2014, Mr Ho (counsel for the Defendant) …”.

3.At page 4 paragraph 11 line J,

“…the draft Notice of Appeal submitted by the Plaintiff and the written submissions advanced by counsel for the Plaintiff,…”

should read

“…the draft Notice of Appeal submitted by the Defendant and the written submissions advanced by counsel for the Defendant,…”.

4.At page 4 paragraph 12 line O,

“… the Judge gave sufficient and good reasons for accepting the evidence of the Defendant’s witnesses…”

should read

“… the Judge gave sufficient and good reasons for accepting the evidence of the Plaintiff’s witnesses…”

Dated the 18^th day of September, 2014.