Read the full judgment text of HCA 1525/2012 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 October 2014.
1. The 1 st defendant applies for security for costs against the plaintiff under Order 23 rule 1 (1)(a), namely that the plaintiff is ordinarily residing out of the jurisdiction and that it is just for the Court to make an order that the plaintiff should provide security for costs for the 1 st defendant. The first issue is a matter of fact to be proved by the 1 st defendant, which is a question of fact and degree. See §§15 & 36 of Hui Yin Sang & Others v Tsoi Ping Kwan & Others CACV208/2011 by
Cited by 4 cases · Cites 2 cases