Read the full judgment text of HCA 146/2013 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 October 2014.
1. The 1 st and 2 nd plaintiffs (“ P1 ” and “ P2 ”) were/are banks each of which had lent money to a Hong Kong company the 1 st defendant (“ D1 ”). The 2 nd defendant (“ D2 ”) is D1’s Korean parent company. The 4 th and 5 th defendants (“ D4 ” and “ D5 ”) were/are Hong Kong companies originally owned by D1. The 3 rd defendant (“ D3 ”) was a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands that provided professional merger and acquisition advisory services.
Cites 1 case