Gammon Construction Ltd v. HKSAR

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 95/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 October 2014.

1. In paragraph 22, second sentence, after “it failed to aver the”, delete the word “person” and replace with “party”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 95/2014
Court
High Court CFI
Date17 Oct 2014
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 95/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO 95 OF 2014

_______________

BETWEEN

  GAMMON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Applicant

and

  HKSAR Putative Respondent
_______________
AND    
    HCAL 96/2014
  CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST  
  NO 96 OF 2014  
_______________

BETWEEN

  LEIGHTON CONTRACTORS (ASIA) LIMITED Applicant

and

  HKSAR Putative Respondent
________________
  (HEARD TOGETHER)  
Before:  Hon Zervos J in Court
Date of Hearing:  8 October 2014
Date of Judgment:  17 October 2014
Date of Corrigendum:  28 October 2014

_____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 17 October 2014:

1.In paragraph 22, second sentence, after “it failed to aver the”, delete the word “person” and replace with “party”.

2.In paragraph 28, after “the resultant conviction”, delete “was wrong because it was framed as” and replace with “were based on”.

3.In paragraph 33, first sentence, after “in the information or a”, delete “variable” and replace with “variance”.

4.In paragraph 39, first sentence, after “incapable of being”, delete “used” and replace with “cured”.

    (Kelvin Chan)
  Clerk to the Honourable Mr Justice Zervos