Read the full judgment text of DCPI 65/2012 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 24 November 2014.
1. The defendant carries on business as a beauty parlour, the plaintiff is its customer. The plaintiff claims damages arising from personal injuries sustained after an intense pulsed light facial treatment (“the IPL treatment”) done by a beautician of the defendant on 17 May 2011 (“the Accident”).
Cites 2 cases