HKSAR v. Tang Wai Leung

Case No.HCCC 50/2014
Court
High Court CFI
Date14 Nov 2014
Judge
Case Document
100%

HCCC 50/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO 50 OF 2014

-----------------

  HKSAR  
  v  
  TANG Wai-leung  
------------------
Before: Hon Zervos J
Date: 14 November 2014 at 3.25 pm
Present: Mr Duncan Percy, on fiat, for HKSAR
  Mr Richard D Donald, instructed by Kent Tam & Co, for the accused
Offence:  Trafficking in a dangerous drug(販運危險藥物)

---------------------------------

Transcript of the Audio Recording

of the Sentence in the above Case

---------------------------------

COURT: The jury by its verdict has found you guilty of trafficking in a dangerous drug, being ketamine.

You operated from the room on the 3rd Floor in the Kwong Hing Building. It was clear that you operated a drug-trafficking business from there where you would sell and supply drugs to others that was clearly evidenced by the quantity of drugs, the digital scale and the quantity of 225 resealable plastic bags for packaging and supplying the drugs. It was also evident the consumption of drugs took place in the room, as the police found a folded $100 bill with a straw containing a quantity of ketamine inside it. Despite being on CSSA, $8,000 was found in your room and it would appear it was the proceeds of your drug-trafficking activity.

I find that no meaningful mitigation can be advanced on your behalf and accordingly I will apply the tariff case of Secretary for Justice v Hii Siew Cheng [2009] 1 HKLRD 1 which sets the scale of sentences that should be imposed, depending upon the quantity of drugs involved with respect to ketamine.

The applicable starting point for the quantity of drugs as charged is 7 years and 10 months’ imprisonment.

I see no reason to depart from or reduce the starting point and accordingly I sentence you to a term of imprisonment of 7 years and 10 months.

Related Cases
Ranked by citation overlap · cases that cite each other appear first
Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCCC 50/2014