Read the full judgment text of DCCC 464/2014 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 11 September 2014.
1. You have pleaded guilty to two charges, the first being theft, contrary to section 9 of the Theft Ordinance. It was theft of a light goods vehicle. The second charge is blackmail, contrary to section 23(1) and (3) of the Theft Ordinance, and the victim of the blackmail offence was the owner of the vehicle, and you essentially demanded $35,000 for the return of the stolen vehicle.