Read the full judgment text of CACV 263/2013 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 12 December 2014.
1. The defendant’s appeal against the judgment of G Lam J on 30 September 2013 ([2013] 5 HKLRD 9) is solely on a question of law, namely, whether the plaintiff’s claim is time-barred by reason of section 20(2) of the Limitation Ordinance, Cap 347. The challenges on the findings of fact have been abandoned two weeks before the hearing. We dismissed the appeal with costs at the conclusion of the hearing and these are our reasons.
Cited by 1 case