Read the full judgment text of FACV 16/2013 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 23 December 2014.
1. The plaintiff (respondent), who was successful before Deputy Judge Seagroatt and the Court of Appeal, was respondent to the defendant’s (appellant) appeal to this court. The appellant who was entitled to appeal as of right, was required to provide security in the sum of $400,000 “as security for the due prosecution of the appeal and the payment of all such costs as may become payable to (the respondent) [1] .” The security for cost was paid into court on 22 July 2013 and on 31 July 2013, Kwa
Cites 2 cases