Read the full judgment text of CACV 238/2013 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 8 January 2015.
1. By our judgment handed down on 26 September 2014, we dismissed the appeal by the plaintiff. The plaintiff applied on 23 October 2014 for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. The plaintiff did not contend that it could have leave as of right. Instead, the plaintiff sought leave on the basis that the intended appeal raises questions of great general or public importance [“GPI”]. It also relied on the “otherwise” limb in section 22(1)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance.
Cited by 28 cases · Cites 1 case