HKSAR v. Juma Ibrahim Suwed

Case No.HCCC 417/2014
Court
High Court CFI
Date15 Dec 2014
Judge
Case Document
100%

HCCC 417/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO 417 OF 2014

-----------------

  HKSAR  
  v  
  JUMA Ibrahim Suwed  

-----------------

Before: Hon Andrew Chan J
Date: 15 December 2014 at 10.24 am
Present: Miss Lo Shui-ying, Sabra, PP of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
  Miss Munira Moosdeen, instructed by Morley Chow Seto, assigned by the Department of Legal Aid, for the defendant
Offence:  Trafficking in dangerous drugs (販運危險藥物)

---------------------------------

Transcript of the Audio Recording
of the Sentence in the above Case

---------------------------------

COURT: The defendant has pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in dangerous drugs in the Magistrates Court. He is committed to this court for sentence.

The summary of facts reveals the following. In the evening on 26 April 2014, the defendant was intercepted by Customs officers at the Customs Arrival Hall of the Hong Kong International Airport. The defendant travelled from Doha to Hong Kong earlier that day. Suspecting that foreign objects might have been concealed inside his body, the defendant was taken to Queen Elizabeth Hospital for further examination.

82 pellets containing 630 grammes of heroin and 110 grammes of 6-monacetylmorphine hydrochloride were subsequently discharged from the defendant’s body. The street value of the drugs was estimated to be about HK$640,000.

The defendant is 31, married with two children. He also has a mother to look after. He is the sole earner of the family. In the course of the mitigation, letters from the defendant and Father Mellor were also submitted. They asked for leniency and mercy. I fully understand that, but in a case as serious as the present one, personal circumstances pale into insignificance.

The defendant is highly educated and his motive for committing the present offence is purely financial. The amount that the defendant stood to benefit had the delivery become successful was substantial. So, in short, he’s not as ignorant as he claims.

Given the fact that 6-monacetylmorphine and heroin belong to the same class of chemical, it will be treated the same as heroin for the purpose of sentencing.

Guidelines on sentencing are clear. Starting point for trafficking in 0.74 kilogrammes of heroin will be in the region of 20 to 21 years’ imprisonment. In this case, since the drugs in question were smuggled across countries and continents, this increases the seriousness of the offence. In view of that, a starting point of 21 years is therefore adopted.

In my view, the only mitigating factor in this case is the defendant’s plea. Given the defendant’s plea he is therefore sentenced to 14 years’ imprisonment.