Read the full judgment text of DCEC 1109/2014 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The applicant claims compensation pursuant to the Employees Compensation Ordinance, Cap 282 (“ ECO ”) for injury at work in June 2013 in the course of his employment with the 1 st respondent. The 2 nd and the 3 rd respondents were at the material times tiers of contractors further up. Besides stating their case in the Answer, the respondents put forward a counterclaim against the applicant. The applicant filed his reply and defence to counterclaim. This caught the court’s attention; and hence
Cites 2 cases