Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 194/2015 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 6 February 2015.
1. By an inter-partes summons (“ Summons ”) dated 23 January 2105, the plaintiff applied under O29 r1, Rules of the District Court and the inherent jurisdiction, for an order to restrain the defendant from remaining in occupation of a premises in Kowloon. At the hearing of the Summons, the defendant was not represented and did not appear. Having been satisfied that the defendant was served with the Summons, I granted the following orders:
Cites 2 cases