HKSAR v. Wong Pak Lok

Case No.HCCC 236/2014
Court
High Court CFI
Date03 Feb 2015
Judge
Case Document
100%

HCCC 236/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO 236 OF 2014

-----------------

  HKSAR  
  v  
  Wong Pak-lok (黃柏洛)  

-----------------

Before: DHCJ S T Poon
Date: 3 February 2015 at 11.02 am
Present: Mr Michael John Bruce Arthur, on fiat, for HKSAR
  Mr Phil Chau, instructed by Foo & Li, for the accused
Offence:  Trafficking in a dangerous drug(販運危險藥物)

---------------------------------

Transcript of the Audio Recording
of the Sentence in the above Case

---------------------------------

COURT: The defendant pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug. The subject dangerous drug is 0.24 kilogrammes of a mixture containing 0.19 kilogrammes of ketamine.

On 14 February 2014, the defendant was stopped by police officers outside Shin Mei House in Fu Shin Estate, Tai Po. The defendant was holding a white box in his hand and upon search a resealable plastic bag containing the subject ketamine was found inside. A sum of HK$30,800 was also found inside the pocket of the defendants jacket.

The estimated retail value of the ketamine involved was HK$27,840.

The defendant is 21 years old. He received education up to Form 3 level. He was a transportation worker at the time he was arrested and according to Mr Chau, counsel representing the defendant, he was earning $14,000 per month. He has one previous record of possession of dangerous drugs which was committed in 2009 for which he was sentenced to the DATC.

Trafficking in dangerous drugs is a serious offence and the Court of Appeal has laid down sentencing guidelines in the case Hui Siew Shing for trafficking in ketamine. As rightly pointed out by Mr Chau, for trafficking in a quantity of 50 to 300 grammes of ketamine, the sentencing range should be a term of 6 to 9 years’ imprisonment.

In the present case, taking into account of the quantity of ketamine involved, the age and background of the defendant, I accept that the appropriate starting point for sentence is a term of 7 years and 6 months’ imprisonment.

Giving the usual one-third discount for the guilty plea, the sentence is reduced to 5 years’ imprisonment.