Hao Xiaoying v. Wong Yiu Lam William and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1968/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 2 March 2015.

1. Hearing heard counsel and considered the draft order provided by Mr Dawes, I have come to the view that it would be appropriate to impose a sentence of imprisonment of 4 months against W Wong for his contempt of court in light of the circumstances of this case.  In particular, the persistent non-compliance with the 1 st Order and the aggravating feature identified in paragraph 68 of the Judgment handed down earlier today.  The sentence needs not be served if he purges his contempt.

Cites 2 cases

Case No.HCMP 1968/2014
Court
High Court CFI
Date02 Mar 2015
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 1968/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1968 OF 2014

__________________

 

IN THE MATTER of an application by HAO XIAOYING against WONG YIU LAM WILLIAM for an Order of Committal

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER of an application by HAO XIAOYING against HUANG KWANG MIN for an Order of Committal

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER of an application by HAO XIAOYING against LAU YAN YIN for an Order of Committal

__________________

BETWEEN

  HAO XIAOYING Plaintiff
  and  
  WONG YIU LAM WILLIAM 1st Defendant
  HUANG KWANG MIN 2nd Defendant
  LAU YAN YIN 3rd Defendant

__________________

Before: Hon Anthony Chan J in Court
Date of Hearing: 2 March 2015
Date of Decision: 2 March 2015
Date of Reasons for Decision: 2 March 2015

___________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION

___________________________________

1.Hearing heard counsel and considered the draft order provided by Mr Dawes, I have come to the view that it would be appropriate to impose a sentence of imprisonment of 4 months against W Wong for his contempt of court in light of the circumstances of this case.  In particular, the persistent non-compliance with the 1st Order and the aggravating feature identified in paragraph 68 of the Judgment handed down earlier today.  The sentence needs not be served if he purges his contempt.

2.As regards the fine to be imposed on Huang and Lau, I believe that the level of fine should reflect the circumstance of this case and must constitute a real punishment for them.  I therefore bear in mind in particular that their contempt of court concerns a large sum of money and there is no suggestion that either Huang or Lau has any financial difficulty.  I also bear in mind the authority of Lau Yee Ching v Wong Tak Kwong & Ors, CACV 385/2005 (3 March 2006), § 6 which has been referred to me by Mr Wong.

3.I take the view that a fine in the sum of HK$150,000 for Huang and for Lau is appropriate.

(Anthony Chan)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Mr Victor Dawes and Mr James Man, instructed by Tony Kan & Co, for the plaintiff

Mr Jonathan Wong, instructed by Fan Wong & Tso, for the defendants