Hao Xiaoying v. Wong Yiu Lam William and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1968/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 2 March 2015.
1. Hearing heard counsel and considered the draft order provided by Mr Dawes, I have come to the view that it would be appropriate to impose a sentence of imprisonment of 4 months against W Wong for his contempt of court in light of the circumstances of this case. In particular, the persistent non-compliance with the 1 st Order and the aggravating feature identified in paragraph 68 of the Judgment handed down earlier today. The sentence needs not be served if he purges his contempt.
Cites 2 cases
|
HCMP 1968/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1968 OF 2014 __________________
__________________ BETWEEN
__________________
___________________________________ REASONS FOR DECISION ___________________________________ 1.Hearing heard counsel and considered the draft order provided by Mr Dawes, I have come to the view that it would be appropriate to impose a sentence of imprisonment of 4 months against W Wong for his contempt of court in light of the circumstances of this case. In particular, the persistent non-compliance with the 1st Order and the aggravating feature identified in paragraph 68 of the Judgment handed down earlier today. The sentence needs not be served if he purges his contempt. 2.As regards the fine to be imposed on Huang and Lau, I believe that the level of fine should reflect the circumstance of this case and must constitute a real punishment for them. I therefore bear in mind in particular that their contempt of court concerns a large sum of money and there is no suggestion that either Huang or Lau has any financial difficulty. I also bear in mind the authority of Lau Yee Ching v Wong Tak Kwong & Ors, CACV 385/2005 (3 March 2006), § 6 which has been referred to me by Mr Wong. 3.I take the view that a fine in the sum of HK$150,000 for Huang and for Lau is appropriate.
Mr Victor Dawes and Mr James Man, instructed by Tony Kan & Co, for the plaintiff Mr Jonathan Wong, instructed by Fan Wong & Tso, for the defendants |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 1968/2014