Read the full judgment text of CACV 18/2000 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 18 July 2000 before Godfrey VP, Woo JA, Ribeiro JA.
Civil procedure – leave to appeal – Court of Final Appeal – final judgment – interlocutory order – section 22 Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance Cap 484 – insurance policy – construction – summary judgment – striking out – parties agreed construction question would be dispositive – no application to treat summonses as final – court made declaration sua sponte – order held interlocutory – no appeal as of right – discretion to grant leave – no great general or public importance – application dismissed with costs
Legal issues: Finality of order under s.22(1)(a) of Cap 484 · Discretion to grant leave under s.22(1)(b) of Cap 484
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal dismissed.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case