Read the full judgment text of FACC 5/2011 on BabelCite. This FACC judgment was delivered on 30 March 2012.
3. 這兩宗上訴被安排一併審理。各名被告人被裁定「為售賣而管有已應用僞造商標的貨品」罪（觸犯《商品説明條例》 [1] 第9(2)條）罪名成立。他們的上訴均提出相同的法律問題，即：
Cites 1 case