HKSAR v. Yeung Ho Wai

CACC 271/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 271 OF 2013

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 407 OF 2012)

____________

BETWEEN

____________

_________________

C O R R I G E N D A

_________________

Please note the following corrections in the Reasons for Judgment dated 31 March 2015:

1. Footnote 13, should read as “However, if you think that a reasonable person would or might have been driven to do what D did, the defence of duress does not apply, and you must find D not guilty.”;

2. Paragraph 39, line 1 “The judge approached his summary” should read as “The judge approached her summary”.

Dated the 10th day of April 2015.