Lau Tin Cheung v. Tianjin Development Holdings Ltd
Read the full judgment text of CACV 2/2015 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 28 April 2015.
1. In my view as the defendant has a reasonably arguable appeal on whether the plaintiff had provided sufficient evidence to support the claim for damage and as the defendant has already paid nearly $2.5 million into Court as condition for the interim stay, I will grant a stay of execution of the judgment on the same terms until the determination of the appeal. Costs of the application be in cause of the appeal.
Cites 1 case
|
CACV 2/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2015 (ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 422 OF 2011) ________________________
________________________
_________________ DECISION 1.In my view as the defendant has a reasonably arguable appeal on whether the plaintiff had provided sufficient evidence to support the claim for damage and as the defendant has already paid nearly $2.5 million into Court as condition for the interim stay, I will grant a stay of execution of the judgment on the same terms until the determination of the appeal. Costs of the application be in cause of the appeal.
Mr Douglas Lam, instructed by T.C. Foo & Co., for the plaintiff Mr Erik Shum, instructed by Gallant Y. T. Ho & Co., for the defendant |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 2/2015