Read the full judgment text of CACV 184/1992 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 June 1993.
1. The 1st plaintiff and the 1st defendant are both financial advisers. The 1st plaintiff is a director and shareholder of the 2nd plaintiff, and, likewise, the 1st defendant of the 2nd defendant. Each runs a business in Hong Kong as financial and investment advisers through his company. The 1st defendant is also a director and shareholder of an United Kingdom company which is a member of the Financial Intermediaries Managers and Brokers Regulatory Association ("FIMBRA"). In their statement of c