Read the full judgment text of HCA 2534/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 May 2015.
1. The plaintiff sues D2 as a guarantor. The issues are whether or not D2’s liabilities as a guarantor had been compromised and whether or not the plaintiff had been lending money in breach of the Money Lenders Ordinance, Cap 163 (“MLO”). A Master gave unconditional leave to D2 to defend and leave to amend his defence. This is the plaintiff’s appeal.
Cites 2 cases